Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Sri Lanka: Transition from the very devastation.

Sri Lanka: Transition from the very devastation.

( Prof.Madan Menon Thottasseri)
__________________________________________________________________


The rehabilitation process should have concluded by Dec,2009 prior to the Presidential poll in Jan,2010. It may be delayed due to the high volumn of War Displaced Persons.


Sri Lankan regime may know that India’s participation and valuable opinions will help them to be more proactive and moderate in designing the road map for a political solution to the ethnicity in the homeland of both Tamils and Sinhalese of all religions.Political parties in Tamil Nadu, in India have to be cautious as the people of both countries who have seen the war with different perceptive outlooks due to a host of reasons in the tiny island nation for many decades and despite having contradictory opinions on the close of the war, each group may have to necessarily have a gracious approach to the complex issue of rehabilitation of refugees and reach a consensus on the issue.

Of course there was international criticism against Sri Lanka on this matter. The promise to release Tamil refugees and detainees was cautiously welcomed by many international organizations and governments. The British Minister for International Development Mike Foster who had been to Sri Lanka expressed disappointment on the slow pace of releasing detainees and warned of withdrawing funding for refugee camps in Sri Lanka. Unfortunately Sri Lankan regime didn’t share the details of plans for resettlement of detainees which prevented global organizations to assist or guide on this respect. This was the main drawback.

The Sri Lankan regime was in a slow pace while deciding on the status-quo to be maintained for the ongoing rehabilitation. Taking into account the volumn of the issue wherein lakhs of people are to be moved out of camps to their respective villages, facilitating the members of a family to join together when they are accommodated in different camps, removal of mines in villages, providing them with house-hold kits etc. will be an enormous and challenging task. Unfortunately Sri Lankan regime didn’t share the details of plans for resettlement of detainees which prevented global organizations to assist or guide on this respect. This was a main drawback.

It was fine that U.S had sent Robert Blake, Assistant Secretary of State, and U.N had sent Maj Gen Patrick Cammaert as Special Envoy of the UN Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict to Sri Lanka. They would have delivered what they are expected to and advised the Sri Lankan government accordingly. There should be a humanitarian approach to the real problems of the innocent people of Tamil origin who are still not rehabilitated and few of them leading a sub-human life in Camps.

In fact President Mahinda Rajapaksa is to be appreciated to begin a CBM for showing a positive deviation for accepting the ‘Indian Concern’ in the Sri Lankan issues and paved the way for the visit of a delegation comprising Indian Parliamentarians from the state of Tamil Nadu, to refugee camps in the island nation in the last year. The Rajapaksa government gracefully came forward to hear opinions from the most responsible political front in India who have empathy to the victims of war in the island nation. The octogenarian Chief Minister Dr.M. Karunanidhi rose to the level of a statesman by interacting with the Sri Lankan regime and enabled a delegation to visit there. In fact the Sri Lankan government and its President were in the lime-light then. People of India, particularly from the state of Tamil Nadu praised President Rajapaksa when he prevailed on the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for steering a fresh relationship with the regime at Colombo and the rehabilitation of war-displaced people of Tamil origin.


Also, the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister refined his vision for peace in Sri Lanka and the life of Tamil speaking people belonging to the island nation for generations. If President Rajapaksa was not sarcastic then, when he had asserted to the visiting Indian delegation that for the political solution to be arrived at towards the ethnic issues of Sri Lanka, he would expect the fulfillment of two conditions viz. the solution is to be acceptable to all communities and it should also be acceptable to the neighbor (India) as well! Even now he can seek the help of India, particularly Tamil Nadu in the ongoing rehabilitation tasks. The Octogenarian Dr.Karunanidhi, the high profile Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu can take the mantle and facilitate for a peaceful atmosphere in Sri Lanka wherein the refugees are to be accommodated back to their normal life in their own villages.

Sri Lankan regime must gather support from all sections of society to arrive at a consensus on a challenging and lasting political solution for the peaceful muti-lingual and multi-religious society in the island nation. It is very important that government has to offer an economic package to refugees returning to native places, for commencement of farming; trade, business and industrial activities for generation of employment opportunities in the regions where they are being resettled. They should be given the right support to live with pride while preserving their own esteemed culture.

Any Sri Lankan regime, here afterwards has to understand that there should be thrust on democratic principles of equality and devolution of power for people to avail equal opportunities and gain equal status under the constitution.

I strongly feel that island nation’s majority people are silently weeping for all carnages which seeded the feeling of abhorrence at the bottom of their minds. Of course, they can relinquish malevolence ideas over a period of time provided there are sincere efforts to put forth CBMs from all quarters.

Each and every citizen of Sri Lanka should contribute their individual might for Peace in their nation while rehabilitating the war displaced Tamil people and implementing a political solution for the Tamil ethnicity in the island nation


President Rajapaksa has to ensure that all citizens are to be assured of their safety and security and guarantee protection from any sources which instigate human rights violations. This will be possible only if an exclusive council with nominated members from the ethnic, minority and immigrant communities is formed in bottom level of Local Administration and Police Departments who can be contacted for any immediate assistance. This responsible council can be given the right to vouch the reliability of detainees who are still not released while suspected as threats to the nation. The high profile members can guarantee for their return to the mainstream society. Let all young people who had associated with militia and waged war be given the chance to return to their family and lead a normal life here afterwards.

At the same time the government should not let any nationalist movements in disguise which instigate people to nurse feelings of repugnance targeting people of a particular creed or culture, whether in majority or minority societies.

Let me recall our Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s visit to Sri Lanka in November,2009 primarily to deliver the 4th Lakshman Kadirgamar Memorial Lecture on Saturday 14th November, 2009 and be at the Sacred Tooth Relic of the Sri Dalada Malingawa Temple in Kandy. He urged Lankans to make use of the defeat of terrorism and secessionism to permanently change the complexion of inter-ethnic relations for the betterment of the island nation. He reiterated that it will be important for everybody in Sri Lanka to realize that a Political settlement is not a ‘zero-sum game’. As a down-to-earth advice, he even cited India’s experience in managing multi-religious and multi-cultural societies. His speech gave thrust on democratic principles of devolution of power, equality for accessing opportunities and equal status before constitution that facilitated India to address divisive tendencies of all sorts. His said “clear separation of powers, rule of law, social justice, secularism, free press, vigilant citizens and civil groups have ensured that threats to your sovereignty from within or without are tackled with an inner strength that can come only through the ballot”.
Every common man in India or Sri Lanka will wish to find a political solution to ethnicity in the war ravaged Sri Lanka. The Opposition front in Tamil Nadu too can interact with refugees in various locations in Sri Lanka and India and come forward with constructive opinions enabling to suggest a political solution package. There should not be any slightest element of Political advantage to target the sensitive linguistic-vote bank in Tamil Nadu while taking a stand in the issue of refugees, by the ruling or opposition fronts. They will be appreciated by the people for their constructive participation and valuable opinions for prompting the regime in Sri Lanka to be more proactive and moderate in designing the road map for a political solution to the ethnicity in the homeland of both Tamils and Sinhalese of all religions.

The Sri Lankan President holds the reins of a US$ 40 billion economy that has enjoyed a partial peace dividend, and is on the path to recovery with big Chinese and Indian investments into infrastructure plans to put US$4 billions into development. Or the nation wounded by decades of war and connected impasse in the development of local industry, business and agriculture, the new government have to heal the same by building a national identity and reconnecting the former war zones to the rest of the world.

Probably the Sri Lankan government has to rebuild the very basic infrastructure viz. power connections, roads, bridges, telephones etc. in the majority affected areas and international donors may be willing to contribute for the same. India can help Sri Lanka by giving assistance in our know-how on installation of telecommunication lines, construction of roads and bridges etc. Sri Lanka can seek help from Indian Railways not only for reopening of bunged railway lines in Sri Lanka but also for creation of a railway network linking small towns especially in north and east with the capital Colombo.

The Sri Lankan Government should apply caution and not to over-celebrate the war victory or election victory solely to enable the nation to have a transition from the very devastation.

India and Sri Lanka together will form a big Trade-Power in the region and can jointly formulate policies for safe-guarding the interests of both countries. Both countries are having almost a uniform export basket and thus can even jointly formulate export strategies for value addition through mutual import of high-quality of tea and plantation produce for further export to Europe and U.S market under the global trade regime and ensure that highest value in foreign-exchange are earned.

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Aftermath of Presidential Election and Impending Political Solution for Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka

Aftermath of Presidential Election and Impending Political Solution for Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka

( Madan Menon Thottasseri)

________________________________________________________________

President Mahinda Rajapaksa may abide by his very first decision taken prior to the declaration of presidential elections that he would have to dissolve parliament upon getting reelected to his office mainly to redesign the burdensome coalition now patronage him.

Rajapaksa wanted a new mandate to sanctify his proposed projects for to rebuild Sri Lanka by exploiting its geographically strategic position astride air and sea lanes, rebuilding infrastructure and encouraging foreign investment and local productivity. Banking that his post-war popularity would secure him a new six-year term, Rajapaksa gambled and called the election two years before his term was set to expire.

President may be keen to reconfigure the current coalition behind him, which has produced a cabinet with more than 100 ministers and has in the past kept him from achieving some of the political tasks he set out to do.

Rajapaksa holds the reins of a $40 billion economy that has enjoyed a partial peace dividend, and is on the path to recovery with big Chinese and Indian investments into infrastructure and plans to put $4 billion into development.

For the nation wounded by decades of war and connected impasse in the development of local industry, business and agriculture , the new government have to heal the same by building a national identity and reconnecting the formerly Tiger-held areas to the rest of the country.

Rajapaksa holds the reins of a $40 billion economy that has enjoyed a partial peace dividend, and is on the path to recovery with big Chinese and Indian investments into infrastructure and plans to put $4 billion into development.

Development of local industry, business and agriculture are what Rajapaksa says will be the key to healing Sri Lanka's divisions, by building a national identity and reconnecting the formerly Tiger-held areas to the rest of the country.

We have to remember that whatever be the adverse opinion from certain quarters about him which he too was aware the Rajapaksa government gracefully came forward to hear opinions from the most responsible political front in India who have empathy to the victims of war. Then the octogenarian Chief Minister Dr.M. Karunanidhi risen to the level of a statesman by interacting with the Sri Lankan regime and enabled a delegation to visit there. The Chief Minister really refined his vision for peace in Sri Lanka and the life of Tamil speaking people belonging to the island nation for generations.

Rajapaksa may still be criticised as at the start of political reconciliation with the Tamil ethnic minority, after the end of the war. He must chalk-out for a fresh process with a strong foundation to retain his image as early as possible.

His regime have to take up the rehabilitation mission with more active international support and ensure that the displaced Tamil speaking people are settled back into their native towns and villages. Similarly the Sri Lankan refugees in India should also be allowed to go back to their native places and enable to settle down there. Primarily the removal of land mines from the villages will be a herculean task for the army. Probably the Sri Lankan government has to rebuild the very basic infrastructure viz. power connections, roads, bridges, telephones etc. in the majority affected areas and international donors may be willing to contribute for the same. India can help Sri Lanka by giving assistance in our know-how on installation of telecommunication lines, construction of roads and bridges etc. Sri Lanka can seek help from Indian Railways not only for reopening of bunged railway lines in Sri Lanka but also for creation of a railway network linking small towns especially in north and east with the capital Colombo.

President Mahinda Rajapaksa has the capability to gather support from all sections of society to arrive at a consensus on a challenging and lasting political solution for the peaceful muti-lingual and multi-religious society in the island nation. The government must give top priority to offer the much awaited ‘Political Solution and Economic Package’ for generating employment opportunities, commencement of farming, trade and business activities in Tamil - Regions where people are being resettled.

The Sri Lankan Government should apply caution and not to over-celebrate the war victory or election victory solely to enable the nation to have a transition from the very of devastation. Of course the president’s Sri Lankan Freedom Party had been keen on seeking people’s mandate for both Parliamentary and Presidential polls upon winning the war in May,2009 and now sweeping victory in the presidential Poll facilitates Rajapaksa in his bid for a second term as President and lead the nation as desired by the majority peace-loving citizens.

Few months back immediately after the war in Sri Lanka there were news reports that the Indian Government contemplates to grant around Rs.600 crores for the rehabilitation of the war displaced people in the island nation. This good gesture must be the beginning of a refurbished Indo-Lanka relationship with due mutual respect and authenticity.
India and Sri Lanka together will form a big Trade-Power in the region and can jointly formulate policies for safe-guarding the interests of both countries. Both countries are having almost a uniform export basket and thus can even jointly formulate export strategies for value addition of high-quality of tea and plantation produce for export to the to Europe and U.S market under the global trade regime and ensure that highest value in foreign-exchange are earned.

The Sri Lanka Supreme Court on Tuesday made a determination on the opinion sought by the re-elected President Mahinda Rajapaksa that his second term in office would commence on November 19, 2010. He has to take fresh of oath of office and secrecy within two weeks from the date his second innings begins.

In effect, this would mean that Mr. Rajapaksa — who won the Presidential election held on Jan 26, by a massive majority of over 1.8 million votes against the former Army Commander and common opposition nominee, General (Retd.) Sarath Fonseka — would get five of six years in his first term and six years commencing from November 2010 for the duration of his second tenure. The next Presidential election would be due on November 19, 2016.

It was fantastic for Rajapaksa to seek to the opinion of the Supreme Court on the question of the actual date of commencement of his second term due to differing views among the legal luminaries on the relevant Constitutional provision as well as a 2005 Supreme Court judgment interpreting the provision on the commencement of a second term to a President who is reelected by an early presidential Poll prior to the close of period of his first term.

New parliament…a Constituent Assembly!

The new Parliament to be elected by Aril 2010 would turn into a Constituent Assembly to draft a fresh Constitution as per the principles enunciated in the recently held presidential Poll’s Manifesto. In all probability it will be the way the House of Representatives did in 1970.

If the president has his way to the new Constitution, then it will lead to clipping of Presidential Powers. As commented by himself in his 2010 elections…. “ the Executive Presidency will be converted into a Trusteeship that honours the a Mandate given to the Parliament by being accountable to the Parliament; establishes equality before law;is accountable to the judiciary enacts laws that are accountable to the judiciary; and is not in conflict with judiciary”.

Aftermath of Presidential Election and Impending Political Solution for Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka

Aftermath of Presidential Election and Impending Political Solution for Tamil ethnicity in Sri Lanka

(Madan Menon Thottasseri)

____________________________________________________________________

President Mahinda Rajapaksa may abide by his very first decision taken prior to the declaration of presidential elections that he would have to dissolve parliament upon getting reelected to his office mainly to redesign the burdensome coalition now patronage him.

Rajapaksa wanted a new mandate to sanctify his proposed projects for to rebuild Sri Lanka by exploiting its geographically strategic position astride air and sea lanes, rebuilding infrastructure and encouraging foreign investment and local productivity. Banking that his post-war popularity would secure him a new six-year term, Rajapaksa gambled and called the election two years before his term was set to expire.

President may be keen to reconfigure the current coalition behind him, which has produced a cabinet with more than 100 ministers and has in the past kept him from achieving some of the political tasks he set out to do.

Rajapaksa holds the reins of a $40 billion economy that has enjoyed a partial peace dividend, and is on the path to recovery with big Chinese and Indian investments into infrastructure and plans to put $4 billion into development.

For the nation wounded by decades of war and connected impasse in the development of local industry, business and agriculture , the new government have to heal the same by building a national identity and reconnecting the formerly Tiger-held areas to the rest of the country.

We have to remember that whatever be the adverse opinion from certain quarters about him which he too was aware the Rajapaksa government gracefully came forward to hear opinions from the most responsible political front in India who have empathy to the victims of war. Then the octogenarian Chief Minister Dr.M. Karunanidhi risen to the level of a statesman by interacting with the Sri Lankan regime and enabled a delegation to visit there. The Chief Minister really refined his vision for peace in Sri Lanka and the life of Tamil speaking people belonging to the island nation for generations.

Rajapaksa may still be criticised as at the start of political reconciliation with the Tamil ethnic minority, after the end of the war. He must chalk-out for a fresh process with a strong foundation to retain his image as early as possible.

His regime have to take up the rehabilitation mission with more active international support and ensure that the displaced Tamil speaking people are settled back into their native towns and villages. Similarly the Sri Lankan refugees in India should also be allowed to go back to their native places and enable to settle down there. Primarily the removal of land mines from the villages will be a herculean task for the army. Probably the Sri Lankan government has to rebuild the very basic infrastructure viz. power connections, roads, bridges, telephones etc. in the majority affected areas and international donors may be willing to contribute for the same. India can help Sri Lanka by giving assistance in our know-how on installation of telecommunication lines, construction of roads and bridges etc. Sri Lanka can seek help from Indian Railways not only for reopening of bunged railway lines in Sri Lanka but also for creation of a railway network linking small towns especially in north and east with the capital Colombo.

President Mahinda Rajapaksa has the capability to gather support from all sections of society to arrive at a consensus on a challenging and lasting political solution for the peaceful muti-lingual and multi-religious society in the island nation. The government must give top priority to offer the much awaited ‘Political Solution and Economic Package’ for generating employment opportunities, commencement of farming, trade and business activities in Tamil - Regions where people are being resettled.

The Sri Lankan Government should apply caution and not to over-celebrate the war victory or election victory solely to enable the nation to have a transition from the very of devastation. Of course the president’s Sri Lankan Freedom Party had been keen on seeking people’s mandate for both Parliamentary and Presidential polls upon winning the war in May,2009 and now sweeping victory in the presidential Poll facilitates Rajapaksa in his bid for a second term as President and lead the nation as desired by the majority peace-loving citizens.

Few months back immediately after the war in Sri Lanka there were news reports that the Indian Government contemplates to grant around Rs.600 crores for the rehabilitation of the war displaced people in the island nation. This good gesture must be the beginning of a refurbished Indo-Lanka relationship with due mutual respect and authenticity.
India and Sri Lanka together will form a big Trade-Power in the region and can jointly formulate policies for safe-guarding the interests of both countries. Both countries are having almost a uniform export basket and thus can even jointly formulate export strategies for value addition of high-quality of tea and plantation produce for export to the to Europe and U.S market under the global trade regime and ensure that highest value in foreign-exchange are earned.

The Sri Lanka Supreme Court on Tuesday made a determination on the opinion sought by the re-elected President Mahinda Rajapaksa that his second term in office would commence on November 19, 2010. He has to take fresh of oath of office and secrecy within two weeks from the date his second innings begins.

In effect, this would mean that Mr. Rajapaksa — who won the Presidential election held on Jan 26, by a massive majority of over 1.8 million votes against the former Army Commander and common opposition nominee, General (Retd.) Sarath Fonseka — would get five of six years in his first term and six years commencing from November 2010 for the duration of his second tenure. The next Presidential election would be due on November 19, 2016.

It was fantastic for Rajapaksa to seek to the opinion of the Supreme Court on the question of the actual date of commencement of his second term due to differing views among the legal luminaries on the relevant Constitutional provision as well as a 2005 Supreme Court judgment interpreting the provision on the commencement of a second term to a President who is reelected by an early presidential Poll prior to the close of period of his first term.

New parliament…a Constituent Assembly!

The new Parliament to be elected by Aril 2010 would turn into a Constituent Assembly to draft a fresh Constitution as per the principles enunciated in the recently held presidential Poll’s Manifesto. In all probability it will be the way the House of Representatives did in 1970.

If the president has his way to the new Constitution, then it will lead to clipping of Presidential Powers. As commented by himself in his 2010 elections…. “ the Executive Presidency will be converted into a Trusteeship that honours the a Mandate given to the Parliament by being accountable to the Parliament; establishes equality before law;is accountable to the judiciary enacts laws that are accountable to the judiciary; and is not in conflict with judiciary”.

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Allegations and Explanations: Can Sri Lanka haul Peace to People’s Mind-set?

Allegations and Explanations: Can Sri Lanka haul Peace to People’s Mind-set?
(Madan Menon Thottasseri)
--------------------------------------------------------------

The United Nations had sought an explanation from Sri Lanka on the death of three top Tamil Tiger leaders after former army chief Sarath Fonseka alleged that surrendering Tamil rebels were killed in cold blood.


The UN special reporter on extra-judicial arbitrary executions Philip Alston had sought an explanation of what had happened to three rebel leaders who wanted to surrender. The three LTTE leaders Balasingham Nadesan, political head of the organisation, Seevaratnam Pulidevan, heading its peace secretariat and senior LTTE commander Ramesh and their families were killed in the last phase of the war on May 18, 2009 as they came out to surrender.


The former Chief Of Army had an explosive interview to the 'Sunday Leader' wherein he alleged that Gotabhaya Rajapaksa, the Defense Secretary and brother of President Rajapaksa had instructed that "all LTTE leaders must be killed."


The U.N letter to Kshenuka Senewiratna, the Permanent Representative of Sri Lanka to the UN Office in Geneva queried that if the allegations put forth are not accurate, share informations and documents proving its inaccuracy. The explanation sought in the said letter, asked “ What information does your Government have on the family members of Nadesan, Pulidevan and Ramesh”.


Gen.Sarath Fonseka came out with allegations of war crimes mainly because of the fact that he is the opposition presidential candidate against President Rajapakse. His credentials were already at stake even prior to his elevation as a consensus Presidential candidate. It is to be noted that Gen.Fonseka was notorious for the annihilation of Tamil regions and his ruthless war-tactics especially when the military crushed LTTE in the last phase of the war.

There were atrocities at both ends in Sri Lanka; the prolonged internal war witnessed all sorts of war tactics, political diplomacies, war-crimes etc. wherein lives of innocent Tamil people were totally disintegrated though the majority of them wanted to have a peaceful contented life in the midst of multi-cultural civilizations without any hostility to one another, what ever be the race or religion.

Unfortunately the people of the beautiful island nation didn’t get a great leader with statesmanship and a towering personality who can emerge out into the mainstream political democracy and integrate people with differences in language, religion or race falling prey to linguistic- nationalistic –religious divisive forces.


President Mahinda Rajapaksa is to be appreciated to begin a CBM when showed a positive deviation for accepting the ‘Indian Conern’ in the Sri Lankan issues and paved the way for the visit of a delegation comprising Indian Parliamentarians from the state of Tamil Nadu, to refugee camps in the island nation.The Rajapaksa government gracefully came forward to hear opinions from the most responsible political front in India who have empathy to the victims of war. The octogenarian Chief Minister Dr.M. Karunanidhi raised to the level of a statesman by interacting with the Sri Lankan regime and enabling a delegation to visit there. In fact the Sri Lankan government and its President was in the lime-light for the past few months. People of India, particularly from the state of Tamil Nadu praised President Rajapaksa when he prevailed on the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu for steering a fresh relationship with the regime at Colombo and the rehabilitation of war-displaced people of Tamil origin.

Also, the Tamil Nadu Chief Minister refined his vision for peace in Sri Lanka and the life of Tamil speaking people belonging to the island nation for generations. If President Rajapaksa was not sarcastic then ,when he had asserted to the visiting Indian delegation that for the political solution to be arrived at towards the ethnic issues of Sri Lanka, he would expect the fulfillment of two conditions viz. the solution is to be acceptable to all communities and it should also be acceptable to the neighbor (India) as well! Now he may be entangled into the Presidential poll to held in January, 2010. He can seek the help of India, particularly Tamil Nadu in the ongoing rehabilitation tasks. The Octogenarian Dr.Karunanidhi, the high profile Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu can take the mantle and facilitate for a peaceful atmosphere in Sri Lanka wherein the refugees are to be accommodated back to their normal life in their own villages.

Every common man in India or Sri Lanka will wish to find a political solution to ethnicity in the war ravaged Sri Lanka. The Opposition front in Tamil Nadu too can interact with refugees in various locations in Sri Lanka and India and come forward with constructive opinions enabling to propose a political solution package. There should not be any slightest element of Political advantage to target the sensitive linguistic-vote bank in Tamil Nadu while taking a stand in the issue of refugees, by the ruling or opposition fronts. They will be appreciated by the people for their constructive participation and valuable opinions for prompting the regime in Sri Lanka to be more proactive and moderate in designing the road map for a political solution to the ethnicity in the homeland of both Tamils and Sinhalese of all religions.


Let me recall that it was heartening to us when the same Gotabhaya Rajapaksa while speaking in a function at Colombo on Sunday 15th November, 2009 appreciated India’s co-operation and Support to Sri Lanka which appeared as head-lines in media. He confidently remarked that Sri Lanka’s commitment for rehabilitation of the displaced Tamils, surrendered or detained LTTE cadres which will empower them to know that the propaganda they were enticed by rebels all these years were false. The rehabilitation would allow them to re-enter the society as productive citizens in the long term. He said “we need to make sure that the unsafe areas in the north are cleared swiftly and the former victims of LTTE’s are resettled in their villages as soon as possible”. Now the news that the same Gotabhaya Rajapaksa is allegedly responsible for the merciless assassination of surrendered Tamil leaders at the close of the war, will be haunting to one and all.


Now the U.N had sought an explanation from Sri Lanka on the death of three top Tamil Tiger leaders after Gene. Sarath Fonseka’s allegation on the cold blooded killing of Tamil rebels when they surrendered. The UN's action follows comments by the former Army Chief that Sri Lankan forces eliminated surrendering Tiger leaders on the orders of the Defense Secretary Gotabhaya Rajapaksa. The explanation on this subject must be given by the present Rajapakse government, but Gen. Fonseka too will be morally responsible to give explanations including his role in the said war-crimes. He should not have prevented himself to disclose on these war crimes at least immediately after his resignation. Instead he waited until becomes a presidential candidate for allegations against Rajapaksas.


I have read news on the special envoy of the U.N Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict- Maj.Gen.Patrick Cammaert who was sent to Sri Lanka at the invitation of the Lankan government. The retired Dutch General would have surveyed on the recommendations of the Security Council Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict on Lanka within the framework of Security Council Resolution 1612 (2005) and woul have reported to the Security Council Working Group on return to New York. I didn’t see any news afterwards on this- whether he ascertained the situation of children adversely affected by the conflict in respect of ensuring child protection rules? What was his proposal for those displaced children who could not be integrated with families or civilian life? Could he identify any NGOs which can participate with the governmental agencies for the reintegration of children?


U.S too sent an Envoy - Robert Blake, Assistant Secretary of State to assess on the rehabilitation of the war displaced people at a time when U.N declared to send Maj. Gen. Patrick Cammaert as Special Envoy .Trust that these envoys have delivered what they are expected to with a humanitarian approach to the real problems of the war displaced innocent people of Tamil origin who should be given the right support to live with pride while preserving their own esteemed culture.


At this time , let me remind on a news report, which was read three-four months back; there was some indifferent and abnormal response to the United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights Ms.Navaneetham Pillay’s request for international investigations into the alleged killing of civilians during the final phase of the war 2006-09 against rebels. She had declared that a similar request was made by the U.N.Secretary General then. As per reports released to press she had revealed that the Sri Lankan government would not let her visit in the nation. Why? Later on there was no news on this matter. Could she come down or not?


I had high-lighted the above mentioned news report in one of my comments, in a web site (newspaper), to get a factual information. I could not see any formal news on the same, except a comment in reply to mine, which may be a public hear-say appeared on the said site –“ This Navaneetham Pillay already tarnished her image by reading LTTE propaganda materials as theirs. She is from S/Africa of Tamil origin. Sri Lankan Navy destroyed three ships from S/Africa carrying ordnance to LTTE. I hope she may be partner in any GUN business in S/Africa”. Still I have no opinion or counter-comments on the subject.

My contention is that if the issue of indifference to United Nations High Commissioner of Human Rights Ms.Navaneetham Pillay’s request for investigations are not resolved or not permitted her to visit Sri Lanka, will it not affect as a disgrace for Sri Lanka, for being non-transparent? Why a chance is given to anyone to suspect the Sri Lankan regime if there is of a concerted positive approach to the rehabilitation programme under the current changed scenario? It will be fine, if a responsible Official from the Sri Lankan High-Commission reading this come forward and brief on this matter. Please do the needful.


Being a person with keen sense of news, I strongly feel that island nation’s majority people are silently weeping for all carnages which seeded the feeling of abhorrence at the bottom of their minds. Of course, they can relinquish malevolence ideas over a period of time provided there are sincere efforts to put forth CBMs from all quarters.


Each and every citizen of Sri Lanka should contribute their individual might for Peace in their nation while rehabilitating the war displaced Tamil people and implementing a political solution for the Tamil ethnicity in the island nation. Both Presidential and Parliamentary polls will be a critical factor for the same.
Can Sri Lanka haul Peace to people’s mind-set?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~