Sri Lanka’s despotic sway crumbling under UNHRC test: India may
have to display a weird decision at Geneva?
( Madan Menon
Thottasseri )
India's PM- Man Mohan Singh speaks with Sri Lanka's President Rajapaksa during their meeting in New Delhi
Sri Lanka's President Rajapaksa shakes hands with his Indian counterpart Mukherjee during their meeting in New Delhi
President Rajapaksa
holds the gearshift of a $40 billion economy that has enjoyed a partial peace
dividend, and is on the track to recuperation by huge Chinese investments
together with less comparable Indian investments as well into infrastructure.
The island nation’s development projects would be more than $4 billion! The entire world must be aware that China cannot be expected
to be unbiased over issues relating to India, particularly connected with
Pakistan, now connected with Sri Lanka too. China’s care for Pakistan was
depicted when it assisted the closest ally for clandestine nuclear
proliferation. Will China demonstrate some unusual boon to Sri Lanka aiming to annoy
India?
Obviously there were
very staid international criticisms against Sri Lanka right from the end of
war. Promises to release Tamil refugees and detainees were cautiously welcomed
by many international organizations and governments. At one stage the British
Minister for International Development Mike Foster who had been to Sri Lanka
expressed disappointment on the slow pace of releasing detainees and even
issued Press Statements warning for withdrawal of funding for refugee camps in
Sri Lanka. Sri Lankan regime had not
shared details of resettlement plans which prevented global organizations to
assist or guide on this respect.
Why Tamil Parties demand
for unification of two provinces to confine their freedom only within a single
enclave? Instead, Tamil speaking Sri Lankans should retain their democratic
right to
come out of the shell and settle anywhere in the nation with full
fledged rights of a citizen.
TNP had apprehension to associate with Tamil parties
to enable in arriving at solutions to the problems faced by the community as a
whole, as it is holding a band of 14
M.Ps from the Tamil speaking regions of North and East together and thus no
chance to out-smart their dominance is to be given to others. Instead of
clamoring for a unified Tamil territory by reuniting northern and eastern
states which may lead to a Tamil enclave and a neglected area by easily
attracting the linguistic nationalism breeding in the island, all parties can
unite to stop attempts by government to deliberate colonization by bring new
settlers to the traditionally ethnic regions. Recently Our Prime Minister had wanted Colombo regime to have deliberations with
the Tamil leadership in the island nation, particularly entailing TNA.
At a time when U.N
Secretary General Ban Ki Moon selected Jessica Neuwrik, Human Rights activist
and a close confidante of Navaneetham Pillai, U.N Commissioner of Human Rights
to lead the U.N panel in Sri Lanka there was big protest in Sri Lanka. The
whole world know on the indifferent response to Navaneetham Pillay’s
request for international investigations into the alleged killing of civilians
during the final phase of the war 2006-09 against LTTE. She had declared that a
similar request was made to Sri Lanka by the U.N. Secretary General then. Still
Sri Lankan government never permitted her to visit the island nation.
The Rajapaksa regime was
silent on its acceptance on the U.N panel even after the episode of fasting by
his Minister Wimal Weerawansa. Later on he even pushed new initiatives, through
NAM to prevail on U.N to accept for a National Commission to co-exist with the
U.N panel? He was not supposed to be unaware that NAM have to be unbiased on
matters connected with rehabilitation and human rights issues and should
rightly reject the Sri Lankan requests, as done earlier. Still there was some
initiative by Egypt at the 118 members’ NAMs despite knowing the fact that
whatever is the end result, it would be irrelevant for an Indian stand on the
issue. No resolution at NAM can undermine the power of the U.N
Secretary General, the apex world forum. There is no parallel between the Sri Lanka
and Middle-East issues. The scenario in Middle- East were different that are
connected with violation of law and order at both ends while the Gaza strip was
occupied by the Hamas. Innocent people are entangled into the tussle between
Israel and Palestinians. Israel had mounted security precautions in the region
due to movement of arms together with civil supplies to the enclave in flotilla
through the Gaza strait.
Sri Lankan regime must
gather support from all sections of society to arrive at a consensus on a
challenging and lasting political solution for the peaceful muti-lingual and
multi-religious society in the island nation. It is very important that
government has to offer an economic package to refugees returning to native
places, for commencement of farming; trade, business and industrial activities
for generation of employment opportunities in the regions where they are being
resettled. They should be given the right support to live with pride while
preserving their own esteemed culture.
I strongly feel that
island nation’s majority people are silently weeping for all carnages which
seeded the feeling of abhorrence at the bottom of their minds. Of course, they
can relinquish malevolence ideas over a period of time provided there are
sincere efforts to put forth CBMs from all quarters.
Each and every citizen
of Sri Lanka should contribute their individual might for Peace in their nation
while rehabilitating the war displaced Tamil people and implementing a
political solution for the Tamil ethnicity in the island nation
President Rajapaksa has
to ensure that all citizens are to be assured of their safety and security and
guarantee protection from any sources which instigate human rights violations.
This will be possible only if an exclusive council with nominated members from
the ethnic, minority and immigrant communities is formed in bottom level of
Local Administration and Police Departments who can be contacted for any
immediate assistance. This responsible council can be given the right to vouch
the reliability of detainees who are still not released while suspected as
threats to the nation. The high profile members can guarantee for their return
to the mainstream society. Let all young people who had associated with militia
and waged war be given the chance to return to their family and lead a normal
life here afterwards.
At the same time the
government should not let any nationalist movements in disguise which instigate
people to nurse feelings of repugnance targeting people of a particular creed
or culture, whether in majority or minority societies.
Let me recall our
President, the then Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee’s visit to Sri Lanka in
November,2009 primarily to deliver the 4th Lakshman Kadirgamar
Memorial Lecture on Saturday 14th November, 2009 and also to visit
the Sacred Tooth Relic of the Sri Dalada Malingawa Temple in Kandy. He had
urged Sri Lankans to make use of the cessation of war to pave the way to
permanently change the complexion of inter-ethnic relations for the development
of the island nation. He did reiterate that the Political settlement is not a ‘zero-sum game’.
As a down-to-earth advice, Pranab Mukerjee even cited India’s experience in
managing multi-religious and multi-cultural societies. His speech had given
thrust on democratic principles of devolution of power, equality for accessing
opportunities and equal status before constitution that facilitated India to
address divisive tendencies of all sorts. His said “clear separation of powers,
rule of law, social justice, secularism, free press, vigilant citizens and
civil groups have ensured that threats to your sovereignty from within or
without are tackled with an inner strength that can come only through the
ballot”.
The regime at Colombo
must understand that there should be thrust on democratic principles of
equality and devolution of power for people irrespective of religion or
ethnicity to avail equal opportunities and gain equal status under the
constitution.
As NAM had precisely let
down Sri Lanka, proving that it will have to avoid poking into complex issues
that exists in the island nation, India gained an advantage to break silence on
this issue, but unfortunately India had not taken any constructive stand! Just
because China which empowers Pakistan in its surreptitious nuclear ambitions
had supported Sri Lanka right from the issue of U.N panel, India had been
keeping mum instead of putting forth the right advice and cautioning the island
nation. There is limit for keeping aloof from the Sri Lankan issue worrying too
much on Chinese overtones in the southern neighborhood or on the likely abnormal
propagation of linguistic nationalism being mooted by certain regional
politicians amongst Tamil speaking people of Tamil Nadu and elsewhere posing
challenges to India as a whole.
What Chief Defence
Staff- Gen. Sarath Fonseka had written with mettle while putting down papers to
President Mahinda Rajapaksa – “Your Excellency’s government has yet to win the
peace, in spite of the fact that the Army under my leadership won the war” had
really became discernible now. The deposed Chief of Ari Lanka military, the
architect of the annihilation of the nonconformist LTTE in a historical
military offensive in May, 2009 would not have imagined so much of predicament
while observing as the opposition’s consensus Presidential candidate in the
2010 poll against the then incumbent President Mahinda Rajapaksa. The former
Commander of Sri Lankan Army who was put behind bars citing military offences
and got released after more than 2 years in May,2012 despite the court-martial
verdict was for 3 years, alone can commend more judiciously on the letdown of
Rajapaksa regime.
The
United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC)’s ongoing session in Geneva which
will end on 22nd March 2013
will cover deliberations on the human rights in Sri Lanka. Though the Lessons
Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC), constituted by Sri Lanka had pluckily
documented shelling of civilians trapped between army and LTTE during final
phase of civil war, ironically the 5
members Court of Enquiry under the Lankan Army had refuted the LRCC findings which
is lastly recognized by President as endorsed by the Defence ecretary!
The recent announcement of
awards worth USD 5,00,000 for two projects in Sri Lanka one for increasing
support and safety of journalists and the other for facilitating reconciliation
in the island nation gained significance as it indirectly upsurge a positive
image for the country. In fact the U.S State Department is to be appreciated
for granting two projects to be undertaken by the Non Profit Organisation- DRL
the goals of which are to strengthen the capacity of independent media in the
area of investigative journalism and increase security for journalists in Sri
Lanka as well as to initiate for the Post-War reconciliation aiming peaceful
co-existence of all communities. Ideally DRL will pitch for deliberations
between cross-community groups and other missions to encourage inter-communal
collaborations for the implementation of programmes as envisaged by the LLRC
recommendations. These grants at this time when U.S is pursuing a resolution on
human rights violations at UNHRC naturally it get significance and there will
be very divergent opinions throughout the world.
These grants will no away
influence any nation to support or otherwise the resolution being put forth in
UNHRC. There is no meaning in suspecting endeavors that are meant for prompting
a nation, its regime and people at large to change perceptions for bringing
together one and all into a cohesive whole to rebuild a motherland for all
stakeholders. DRL is to be complimented for avowing that it will not consider
any proposals that show any prejudiced supports to any member, affiliate or
representatives of designated terror factions whether or not elected members of
the government.
A Protest against War Crimes in Sri Lanka by DMK MPs in front of the at Parliament House at New Delhi
DMK, one of the
traditional regional Parties in Tamil
Nadu, part of the UPA government in centre had revived the Tamil Elam
Supporters’ Organisation ( TESCO) in tune with the changed scenario while
seeking lasting solution to the ethnicity in northern Sri Lanka as well to
initiate a credible world enquiry into
all events of violation of human rights, ethnic killings and war crimes
especially while surrendering to army, inhuman acts of oppression, sexual
assaults and torture of helpless persons, including the family of LTTE leader
Prabakaran etc. DMK Chief M Karunanidhi had expressed his displeasure on the
divergent views aired by the UPA government and the Congress party. It seems that the External Affairs Minister
Salman Khurshid had asked his counterpart in Colombo to engage with U.S and
keep him informed on the Lankan initiatives to improve human rights to enable
India in arriving at a draft acceptable to all. While Ghulam Nabi Azad, General
Secretary of the All India Congress Committee and in-charge of party affairs in
Tamil Nadu had attended the TESO meeting held at New Delhi on 7th
march, 2013 had positively proclaimed that the draft resolution in the United
Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva would be guided by the decision to
support the resolution against Sri Lanka in March 2012.
Naturally
pressure is being build up on the UPA
government as the all most all political
parties including the main Opposition BJP
together with CPI too wants to vote against Sri Lanka for the second
time within a year and also to support the resolution demanding for effective
measures so as to restore human rights of ethnic Tamils communities there.
Simultaneously Sri Lanka has to ensure culpability on perpetrators who violated
human rights and set up uphold for their socio-economic, cultural and land
rights.
Navaneethan
Pillay, the UN Commissioner for Human Rights, while addressing the opening
session of UNHRC on 25th February, 2013 had mentioned on the rapidly
deteriorating human rights situation in Iran and Sri Lanka. She had fervently
attacked President Mahinda Rajapaksa and his regime for massive violations and despondently
hauled India to the scene stating that India will have to face the dilemma on
which way to vote while U.S and allies bring the issue of human rights
violations in the UNHRC. Sri Lankan minister Mahinda Samarasinghe had retorted
in his address accusing Navaneetham Pillay acting according to a secret agenda,
without responsibility!
It is high time for
India to arrive at a precise stand on the issue of the resolution being moved
by U.S in UNHRC against Sri Lanka for its role in human rights violations and
ethnic killings during the final stage of civil war. Indian stand should
reflect the sentiments of all our citizens, especially from Tamil Nadu. Of
course, whatever be the Indian stand and the outcome of the resolution put
forth in UNHRC against Sri Lanka, India must ensure that Sri Lankan regime
comes out with an indisputable political solution after the inclusive
rehabilitation of the war displaced people.


